Rangers weigh two goalkeeper options
Rangers’ search for a first-choice goalkeeper has reached two names: Palermo’s Sebastiano Desplanches and Hull City’s Ivor Pandur. Journalist Luca Bendoni reports that both are on the club’s list of summer options, though there’s no indication yet that Rangers have made a move. That distinction matters: a name on a shortlist signals interest or assessment, but it doesn’t establish that a bid has been made, talks have started, or either player is the preferred choice.
For Rangers, identifying candidates is only the first part of a recruitment decision. The club would need to weigh each goalkeeper’s record, role, availability and likely cost against what it wants from the position. The information available so far offers a starting point for comparing the two, not a clear answer about who would be the better fit.
Two profiles under consideration
Desplanches, 23, is also attracting interest from Norwich City and several Italian clubs, according to Bendoni. The goalkeeper is currently with Palermo, a Serie B side, where he conceded 50 goals in 27 appearances last season. Those figures describe his workload and results, but they don’t reveal how many chances he faced, how difficult those chances were, or how much of the total was down to the goalkeeper. Without that context, goals conceded alone offer only a limited measure of performance.
His age may make him a different kind of candidate from Pandur: at 23, he could be viewed as a longer-term option, while still needing to show how his performances translate to another club and competition. That’s a consideration, not proof that Rangers see him in that role. The reported interest from Norwich and Italian clubs also means Rangers may have competition if they decide to pursue him. For now, the report doesn’t say whether any of those clubs have made an offer.
Pandur, 26, was Hull’s first choice during the campaign in which the club secured promotion to the Premier League. He conceded 65 goals in 48 matches. Hull have already been linked with possible replacements, which could open a path for Pandur to leave, though a reported replacement search doesn’t confirm that Hull are ready to sell. Transfermarkt lists his value at €4.5 million; Desplanches is valued at €1 million.
Their listed values give readers a rough point of comparison, but they shouldn’t be mistaken for confirmed asking prices or the full cost of a transfer. Contract terms, the selling club’s position and competition for a player can all affect a deal. The contrast in those valuations may shape how Rangers assess their options, but the available information doesn’t establish what either goalkeeper would actually cost.
Butland’s season sharpens the focus
Jack Butland remains Rangers’ number one, with Liam Kelly and Kieran Wright as back-up options. Butland, now 33, conceded 72 goals in 55 appearances across all competitions last season and recorded 16 clean sheets. Those figures help explain why Rangers are assessing alternatives, but they don’t, by themselves, show whether his performances were below the club’s expectations. A goalkeeper’s totals reflect the team’s defending as well as his own work, and clean sheets depend on the whole side keeping opponents from scoring.
Still, the volume of goals conceded gives Rangers a clear reason to review the position. This is more significant than it looks: a first-choice goalkeeper affects not just who starts each week, but also how much security a club has if results or performances turn. If you’re working in this space, the key question isn’t simply which candidate conceded fewer goals; it’s what each can contribute within Rangers’ defensive setup and whether the evidence supports making a change.
And this is the part most people overlook: the numbers in the report come from different teams and circumstances. Desplanches’ 27 appearances and Pandur’s 48 matches don’t provide a direct comparison, while Butland’s total covers all competitions. The figures are useful clues, but they can’t settle a recruitment decision without fuller performance information and a clearer picture of what Rangers want from the position.
What the shortlist could mean
For now, the reported interest amounts to evaluation rather than a confirmed pursuit. The summer window will show whether either goalkeeper moves from Rangers’ shortlist to a concrete target. Rangers may also have other options that haven’t been reported, so the two names shouldn’t be treated as the full extent of the club’s search.
That said, putting a younger goalkeeper and a player who has been a regular starter in the same conversation suggests Rangers are considering candidates with different records and circumstances. A shortlist can help a club compare those profiles before deciding where to focus its resources. It can also change as a selling club’s plans develop or a player’s availability becomes clearer. No such change is confirmed here.
Here’s the thing: a reported list is news, but it’s still an early signal. The more meaningful developments would be evidence of direct negotiations, a bid, or a confirmed decision by Rangers to pursue one of the two. Until then, the clearest takeaway is that the club is assessing alternatives to Butland, while the choice of successor, if there is one, remains open.
The post Glasgow Rangers have two goalkeepers on list – Clearly looking for a new number one appeared first on Sport Witness.